
by Ana
4 comments
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 5 months ago:
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 5 months ago:
Great one!! See you can still do it... I've been thinking of a self-portrait for this Topic!!
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
I like the idea behind this shot, the only thing that bothers me is the shallow depth of field, too little of the image is in focus.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) added a critique 7 days ago:
I agree with Angad, great idea, with humor, but too much of the scene is out of focus.

by HuubL
12 comments
JLM (Joel Le Montagner) added a critique 5 months ago:
Nice shot with this dust !
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
Very nice, the early morning fog/haze thing really works in this shot.
HuubL said 5 months ago:
Not sure if I did something wrong, but I added this photo to a second Topic and now it is back on top of the queue...
Please let me know if this is allowed, otherwise I'll delete it from the "Fog" topic.
Thea (CA Taylor) added a critique 3 months ago:
The haze, the cart, and the uneven road all work to give you an idea of what traveling here must be like, the photo works well just as it is.
BAZIQfemine (Fia Baziq) added a critique 1 month ago:
Background has a bit of a fairytale-feeling to it, like a painting. And I like this new meets old. A bit tilted but other than that, Brilliant!!

by lasiate
7 comments
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 5 months ago:
Nice capture, they sure are interested in you. Very good capture. I might have "punched" the tonal range a bit.
cushmok added a critique 4 months ago:
bravo ! très belle image bien en relation avec le thème !
bluechameleon (Sharon Wish) added a critique 4 months ago:
Oh...this is really such an amazing capture! The artwork as a backdrop for these children works wonderfully. It's as though they have escaped a nightmare, and are completely unscathed. If I were to do it differently, I wouldn't change a thing :)
stilfoto (Stefan Nielsen) added a critique 4 months ago:
A great capture indeed - a pcure I can look at for a long time...
The children are perfectly placed in the frame and doing it in B&W was the right choice. The only minor thing I might have done differently is crop out the door on the left - but as I said: It's a minor thing. All in all it's a great picture.
sambhara (Michael Bogdan) added a critique 2 months ago:
I don't know which i like best; the children or the art work. One thing is for sure; they go great together...

by misu
13 comments
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
I agree about the saturation being a bit too high. Another suggestion would be capturing either 1/3rd of the sky or the grass setting the other element take 2/3rd. Excellent image nonetheless!
ple (ferry kana) added a critique 4 months ago:
high contrast, high saturated !!! just the one that i like !!
360Pixels (Ayash Basu) added a critique 4 months ago:
Eye catching image for sure. I might have preferred a)less saturation on the colors and b)a non-square "landscape" view.
GarrettHall (Garrett Hall) added a critique 4 months ago:
I would crop 10% off of the top. The 10% has interesting clouds, but I think it would look better without it. Did you get any longer exposures showing the wheat moving?
lotr_n1 (Nathan Hauser) added a critique 3 months ago:
wow

by Beamer
7 comments
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) added a critique 5 months ago:
I love this! The color version is very good - this takes it up a notch, in my opinion. Love the spaciousness you have allowed in the compostion.
Best,
Jon
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 5 months ago:
Thanks Jon!!
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
Lovely, though I would have preferred the flowers facing the light.
bradford (Bradford Levine) added a critique 4 months ago:
Nice composition, contrast and texture. Great work.
op_perrin (Olivier Perrin) added a critique 3 months ago:
vu que tu as mis les deux versions, une préférence pour la couleur, elle est très belle, avec cette lumiere, que la version b&w ne fait pas ressortir

by leetsil
6 comments
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 5 months ago:
This is beautiful and I agree with Jon as usual bout the light and the feel. I wonder if the composition isn't a bit too wide and high. I wish there was a bit more of the bottom of the petals and maybe a little less top and left.
redcat77 (Agnes Milosz) added a critique 5 months ago:
Love it! It is sharp where it supposed to be and soft where it supposed to be... and the colour is just amazing!!!!! As I am addicted to the flower photos this is definately going to my favourites :)
leetsil (Bernhard Plank) said 5 months ago:
thx for the great response, but i think i have an other picture 4 you: www.vazaar.com/photos/id:29714/ ;)
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
Very nice! I like this one a lot, except maybe next time you could keep the depth of feel a little less shallow so that a little more is in focus.
360Pixels (Ayash Basu) added a critique 4 months ago:
I like it a lot, perhaps add a few pixels to the bottom, other than that this is super.

by jodosh
4 comments
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 5 months ago:
The tonal range of this image is a little thin. The highlights are blown out and the darks are not "punchy" The image comes across a little dull. The DoF is nice and I like the refection!!
mikeock (Mike Adams) added a critique 5 months ago:
Very good attempt.
I agree with the above comments.
This is really a wonderful idea that just needs a little bit of exposure help!
Great job.... Let see you re-shoot if possible!
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
Nice. A little wider perhaps and with all of the car in focus?
boyd added a critique 5 months ago:
I have to agree with the comments above. I like the point of view here and it is well on the way to being a very strong shot.

by doilyboy
15 comments
...10 older comments hidden...
ikol22 (Fabrizio Zanelli) added a critique 11 months ago:
Hong Kong airport?
PhotoDaniels (Stephanie Daniels) added a critique 11 months ago:
Oustanding!! The reflections, silhouettes, everything! Just perfect!
doilyboy (Martin Grey Gottlieb) said 11 months ago:
Hey everyone,
Thanks for the comments and the feature. As I mentioned, I was playing with toning and settled in where you see you it. Glad it seemed to work on some level.
lkol22: This is the airport in Seattle.
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
Wow! Absolutely wonderful!
doilyboy (Martin Grey Gottlieb) said 5 months ago:
Thanks!

by jvgphoto
10 comments
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) said 5 months ago:
Thanks to all for the kind words.
@Beamer: Not a waterfall - just the Gulf of Mexico - jon
crahan (Thomas Bouve) added a critique 5 months ago:
Very nice black and white conversion and a great composition. I also like how the background darkens towards the left. Nice work Jon!
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) said 5 months ago:
Thomas,
Thanks for taking the time to comment - much appreciated.
Jon
boyd added a critique 5 months ago:
Jon, there is lots to like about this shot and agree with the comments above. I would like to add that I also like the selection of square format here to really lift the compostion to another level. Congratulations.
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
Excellent composition. I've always held the opinion that wildlife photos work best in color, but this one works in B/W as well.

by BeppeRdam
3 comments
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 5 months ago:
I like the imagination of this!! Strange collection, but holds a lot of interest.
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) added a critique 5 months ago:
Works for me as well - love the overall feeling and effect - nice job lighting this one.
Best,
jon
apsk121 (Angad Kingra) added a critique 5 months ago:
A little wider would have been much better IMO. Other than that makes for a good black and white shot!
Good job. It shows your technical ability's and it's kind a funny, too. Only thing I would do diffrent (if I would be able to it :p )is photographing this scene with the text not upside-down. Just twist the image 180 degrees won't do it of course, the perspective would not be right then.