Comments would be greatly appreciated. This is a daytime shot in a park with infrared enhancement of the photo.

Hi Sher ! In my humble opinion, the infrared enhancement can be efficient when the viewer can recognize lots of details, for an example on a landscape with a road, trees, house or other elements. I'm not an expert with this technic, but I feel that your attempt does not show enough of these details, the result is a bit flat, I think. I hope you will not be too disappointed, and that you will go on trying ;-)

MMeye - I am not in the least disappointed by your kind critique! I wish to learn this technique and am obviously self-taught. I appreciate your ideas and will work on the details as you suggest. Thanks for your time!

je ne suis pas vraiment convaincu. Je te conseille le site d'un superbe photographe Mc Dermott. Je connais Angkor et j'ai été fasciné
www.asiaphotos.net/gallery/

I agree with MMeye regarding the detail. Infrared allows us to see details we typically take for granted in a new and different way. More often than not, the effects of using infrared are lost on large, simple scenes, so MMeye is correct. Can't wait to see what you come up with that in mind...keep 'em coming!

Previous comment stand, lack of focus and subject.
just as a curiosity did you use an infrared lens or manipulation in ps (infrared enhancement of the photo) is not clear in my mind as the technic use.
Thanks

I'm sorry, but I cannot say in english: credo sarebbe stato meglio salvare di più i particolari: così sembra una foto invertita e un po' sovraesposta. però è affascinate!

alberto

Thank you all for taking the time to comment, critique and suggest. This is photoshop work for the infrared - my first attempt. I have a bit to learn but wanted initial ideas and critism. Thanks again!

i think there is a lack of focus. nice contrast. not sure i like the infrared. would love to see the detail of the trees