
by boyd
4 comments
ApurvaMadia (Apurva Madia) added a critique 1 month ago:
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) added a critique 1 month ago:
The reflection in the window is too much. Too bad, would have made a great still. Great framing too.
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 1 month ago:
I agree with Jan, but sadly, Apurva mistakes film grain for noise. Ah those young pups that don't know what film is...
mooch added a critique 26 days ago:
Harder blacks would make for a stronger contrast and subsequently more powerful image. I like the subject matter but feel you could really push this.

by Beamer
6 comments
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 30 days ago:
Thanks Livia!! This was taken from the hills above my home in Claremont, CA.
warreagle (Amy Warr) added a critique 30 days ago:
must've been a beautiful sunset to see in person!
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 30 days ago:
Wow! Is it a sunset or a sundown? I saw the colors of a L.A. sunset myself and this pic brings me back to that moment!
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 30 days ago:
Yep, sunset, brown smog mixed with reds, yellows and magenta's. A strange brew for sure...
mooch added a critique 26 days ago:
I like this shot. Great tones and the landscape really does look vast.

by pao_alfonso
6 comments
pao_alfonso (Pao Alfonso) said 2 months ago:
oh yeah, i didn't notice that before. they are a little bit different, huh? I also just noticed that pole on the far left, haha. funny I should only notice that now. thanks for the comment!
Bastian (Bastian Löhrer) added a critique 1 month ago:
I would crop the top so that none of the blue of the sky can be seen.
Bastian (Bastian Löhrer) added a critique 1 month ago:
Great image though, adore it!
boyd added a critique 1 month ago:
The depth that you have created in your image is really quite captivating, as is the detail in the trunks and branches. I also think that the toning that you have selected works very well to create a very strong image overall. Nice work.
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 28 days ago:
I agree with most of the above comments, not sure about the one about the sky though. I like the relief it gives to the tones and hues of the main subject.

by bbonner
4 comments
bbonner (Bonner Photographic) said 1 year ago:
As people requested - the image in colour. I like it in BW much better, but I think its a good image in color too. I shot this on Bronica - and it reminds me why I love medium format for things that don't move.
So take a look at the BW and tell me which you think is better - and more importantly, why it one is better.
PhotoDaniels (Stephanie Daniels) said 1 year ago:
Definately the color! All I can say is Wow!!
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 1 year ago:
This IS lovely. I think I do prefer the color version better.
BUT, I am curious why the colors are so different in the refection that in the real object. Especially noticeable in the mountain on the right of frame, reflection is quite a bit greener that the real mountain. The mountain on the left is the opposite, the real mountain has a lot of color but the reflected mountain seems desaturated???
berglings (micke bergling) said 29 days ago:
Wow!like the sharpness and the incredibly beautiful mountains, neatly captured.

by carolinehancox
3 comments
Smooch added a critique 30 days ago:
Another nice tonal range in this one. Good skin texture also. Perhaps if you turned the body a bit more towards the camera you could have picked up a bit more depth from the curves of the back and the buttocks. I still would've cropped from the top again, but that is subjective at best. I like how the highlights gradually dissolve to black. I think a few white reflectors could enhance the drop off more. Keep up the good work.
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 29 days ago:
I too think the composition is a bit too tall at the top. I also wish the image was a bit sharper overall. I agree with Smooch, nice tonal range.
pao_alfonso (Pao Alfonso) added a critique 29 days ago:
very nicely done. i love the contour, teh lighting. agree with beamer on the sharpness, though.

by carolinehancox
4 comments
Smooch added a critique 1 month ago:
Nice tonal values. Interesting composition. Cropping much more from the top would help strengthen the bodyscape feel of this image IMO. I'm just wondering, if you shopped out the navel, if it would help the bodyscape or abstract feel to this image. Love the texture also.
livia (Livia) added a critique 30 days ago:
I agree with Smooch with regard to cropping the upper part of the image. For me this image somehow surpasses the boundaries of a human body shape. And this is what I like most.
carolinehancox (Caroline Hancox) said 30 days ago:
Thanks for your comments, I hadn't thought about cropping it in a bit at the top so I might try that and see if I like the result better, it is really good to get peoples honest opinions about your work because sometimes something gets pointed out to you that you would just not of seen
Thanks again for taking the time to look at my work
x
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 29 days ago:
Crop, me too. This one has a nicer feel overall, a little more detail, so I guess a little sharper. Next time try to get the model to not wear tight clothing before the shoot, the marks on the hip are a bit disappointing in the lower right.

by lasiate
5 comments
lasiate said 1 month ago:
Java-Borobudur
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 1 month ago:
A whole another look too the topic architecture: usually their are about details of a building or a panoramic view where you can see the building in all its greatness.
However the picture shows hardly any details, it's very recognizable. Well done! Only thing what's bothering me a bit (just a bit nitpicking) are the two poles left from the tree.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) added a critique 1 month ago:
Great how you placed the sun directly behind the main structure. The picture looks like a fractal - great effect.
I agree with Tamara that the two poles are in the way, but what could you do? Take a large axe along on your next photo shoot?
ApurvaMadia (Apurva Madia) added a critique 1 month ago:
In my view too much empty areas and silhoette makes this worse. Not a shot write home about!
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 30 days ago:
Looks like a forest of temples!! Nice backlite image.

by Afoklala
4 comments
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 1 month ago:
Het is een ruizige foto, en dat is zonde. Om heel eerlijk te zijn ben ik ook niet echt weg van de compositie. Een gebouw als deze biedt wel veel mogelijkheden, blijf hiermee experimenteren.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) said 1 month ago:
Dank je voor het commentaar, Tamara. Het gruizige zie ik niet zo, misschien is mijn monitor vergevingsgezinder? De compositie is een kwestie van smaak denk ik. Ik vond de bolling van het gebouw en het schip wel mooi bij elkaar passen. Misschien moet ik links er nog een stukje afsnijden, tot aan de rand van het gebouw.
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 1 month ago:
Hoi Jan Willem,
Ik heb een gloednieuwe mooie monitor, dus de ruis is wel degelijk aanwezig. :)
Als ik ook naar je andere werk kijk, zou ik je in het algemeen als tip willen geven wat minder je foto's te bewerken. Zoek eerder naar goede belichting, mooie composities en naar wat jij en je camera kunnen.
Groetjes!
Tamara
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 30 days ago:
Cool the way the building looks like it's part of the ship.

by Smooch
5 comments
Smooch said 1 month ago:
Image taken with Nikon Coolpix 950 converted to infrared.
ApurvaMadia (Apurva Madia) added a critique 1 month ago:
Great! Looks like a night shot!
kseniaC (ksenia) added a critique 1 month ago:
looks very very delicate
and the plants almost look like jewels.
and the birds in the back add a very interesting effect to the picture.
great shot!
Marcah (Marc Hollembeak) added a critique 1 month ago:
Nice work. Seems all things are as they should be.
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) added a critique 30 days ago:
Nice job!! Different take on a common theme. The birds are great!!

by Beamer
1 comment
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 1 month ago:
Pinto Mountain in Joshua Tree NP. This is located in the lower, eastern half of the park. This is pano from 6 shots of FP4+ film.
A little noisy image I think. Could do with some contrast too!