The rows in the foreground that are planted in a different direction are distracting and ruin the extreme vanishing point perspective you have here. I would crop right up to the edge of the rows that run parallel to the camera angle, imo. This would also make the image feel more expansive. Great sky, great subject, nice job on controlling the exposure. Might need just a bit of straightening, seems to run uphill on the left.

Beamer made some very nice points. The sky is great, but the plants in the foreground are a little unwanted. It's slight, but there is definitely a tilt going up on he left. Very great shot though with lots of potential.

Gracias por las aportaciones, las tendré en cuenta.
Saludos

The foreground is too dominant and not very interesting.

jon

I agree with all of the observations made above. I would like to add that the darkness on the left side of the frame adds to the unbalanced feel.

I appreciate the comments above, but am not so troubled by the opposite planing of the rows in front. If the main subject was at the vanishing point of the rows, then I might think differently, bu the fact is that there are differences and not everything goes the same way and is uniform. I quite like the feeling of vastness that the foreground gives within the context - and can almost hear the silence. The slightly disturbing thing for me is that the horizon cuts the image in half, perhaps that would be a reason to crop a little from the bottom. Otherwise, tops.

Great. I like such fields! Sky is amazing!

WOW! the DOF (Depth of Field) is enhanced by the rows in the ground. Just beautiful.

Agree with most of what has been said already. I would have walked further in and tried a 2/3 sky - 1/3 land composition.