
by Beamer
11 comments
Smooch added a critique 19 days ago:
Neuner added a critique 18 days ago:
Very Cool. I'm curious as to what a shot would look like if the tree was directly in front of the sun.
boyd added a critique 13 days ago:
Way cool shot, Clyde. Great in every category listed.
kseniaC (ksenia) added a critique 12 days ago:
great shot!
and amazing silhouette!
the tree almost looks like it belongs in a dr.seuss book
:]
Pradeep (Pradeep P) added a critique 2 days ago:
Great silhouette and light. Love your choice of b&w :)

by Afoklala
2 comments

by Afoklala
3 comments
Ana (Ana Cortez) added a critique 5 days ago:
you sure like this scene, don't you?
It fits the topic, but otherwise, it doesn't do much to impress.
The building at the back is tilted, the scene is chopped off and parts of it are over-exposed. I keep wanting to tilt it this way or that.
But like I said. Fits the theme, but maybe because of the selective saturation.
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 5 days ago:
I agree with Ana. The idea is good, but you has to work it out more (starting with changing the brand of the beer, ieuw ;)
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) said 3 days ago:
Thanks for the comments. I did try and rotate the picture to set the horizon straight. However, to me, this took all the excitement out of it.
I was going for the "rhyme" between the green in the front and in the back.
And don't talk beer brands to me, dear, I rarely ever drink it. (more into wine and whiskey, me)

by Afoklala
2 comments

by Afoklala
2 comments
Ana (Ana Cortez) said 5 days ago:
hmm.
It is very out of focus. Is this an extreme crop?
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) said 3 days ago:
This is an extreme crop, yes. Somehow, it doesn't work as well here as when I look at it in my photo editor. The out-of-focus didn't bother me there, but here it does.

by Afoklala
2 comments

by Afoklala
2 comments
Ana (Ana Cortez) said 5 days ago:
This looks like a super cool place, but I feel like I'm missing so much of what is really there.
It seems either closely cropped, or framed too narrowly.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) said 3 days ago:
Thanks for the comment. In this case, I was trying to focus on the rhythm, not on the real objects. I deliberately cropped out everything that would disturb that. Whether I succeeded, is another matter.

by Beamer
7 comments
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) added a critique 7 months ago:
Nice work on this, Clyde. Love the light and shades of gray that you have managed to reproduce in this shot. Cooool!
Jon
Pradeep (Pradeep P) added a critique 7 months ago:
Amazing! Beautiful abstracts.
Pradeep (Pradeep P) added a critique 7 months ago:
Amazing! Beautiful abstract.
Pradeep (Pradeep P) added a critique 7 months ago:
Oops! Sorry about the double post.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) added a critique 7 days ago:
I want to look at this as an artistic achievement (which it is) but I'm a bit phobic about this particular critter I'm afraid... It's so unclear that I can almost enjoy the picture, but then I read Ana's comment, and imagine myself being the tiny person, and I find myself running away again.

by Beamer
8 comments
sfkp (Tamara) added a critique 5 months ago:
I don't think that's the cutted haead of his friend... I think it is it's own! :p
Beamer (Clyde Beamer) said 5 months ago:
Tamara, you are correct. Only one fish here, ugh! At least he got to see his own end...
jvgphoto (jon van gilder) added a critique 5 months ago:
Hi,
I love the detail in the mouth. I would have gone for a major crop and come in on that mouth - a completely different photo to be sure.
Best,
jon
boyd added a critique 4 months ago:
I agree that this is both a disturbing and interesting shot. Perhaps, though, I would like to see a little more of the "guts" side because the detail there looks absolutely fabulous. Well seen and taken.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) added a critique 7 days ago:
I can't get my head round whether this is utterly beautiful or utterly disgusting. Very well done.

by Afoklala
2 comments
Ana (Ana Cortez) said 7 days ago:
It certainly fits the topic, but it's so tightly framed, that I feel like I'm missing a whole lot of the shot.
Afoklala (Jan Willem van Dormolen) said 7 days ago:
I understand what you mean. That was deliberate, the building itself was not so interesting, and I wanted to focus on the disusedness/unuseability (do those words exist?) of the thing.
I agree with all of the above. I really like the vignette effect. Not easy to do on a Zone 5 or 6 sky without lots of clouds. Quiet inspiration.